Asrock H110M-HG4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H110M-HG4  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161219
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 27 '17 at 21:56
Run Duration446 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G3900-$25
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Memory 81.4
1-Core 71.6
2-Core 109
56% 87.3 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 153
18% 142 Pts
64-Core 149
9% 149 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Nvidia(10DE 11C0) 2GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.53
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
1.05% Terrible
Lighting 0.63
Reflection 0.85
Parallax 2.41
0% 1.3 fps
MRender 2.33
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 2.52
2% 2.55 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 1.05%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$31
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 486
Write 215
Mixed 379
80% 360 MB/s
4K Read 9.48
4K Write 91
4K Mixed 4.3
68% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 0.05
49% 119 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 86%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
0GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
3.55% Terrible
Read 17.7
Write 2.73
Mixed 2.78
7% 7.74 MB/s
4K Read 1.59
4K Write 0.002
4K Mixed 0.003
6% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.55%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905622-058.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
36.7% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 10.9
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 9.8
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-HG4 Builds (Compare 388 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-HG4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback