HP HPE-510t

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP HPE-510t  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AB6
Memory1.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110411
Uptime913.9 Days
Run DateApr 04 '22 at 05:44
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 90.5
1-Core 88.1
2-Core 165
69% 115 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 325
43% 322 Pts
64-Core 342
21% 342 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 405
Device(1B0A 908E) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.26% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 0.4
1% 1.23 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1.6
1% 1.63 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.26%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 80 88 83 115 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 118
Write 99.5
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 100
69% 93.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 0.9
254% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 184%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
40.1% Average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 12.6
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.2
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HPE-510t Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP HPE-510t

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $272
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback