Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 196% UFO	Desktop 102% UFO	Workstation 193% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	199% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Gigabyte X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF (all builds)
Memory	27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20191128
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 03 '22 at 20:14
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375 28,524 User benchmarks, average bench 80% CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Memory 91.7 1-Core 148 2-Core 294 97% 178 Pts	4-Core 584 8-Core 989 96% 787 Pts	64-Core 1,492 92% 1,492 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660 155,335 User benchmarks, average bench 204% Asus(1043 8802) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	199% Outstanding	Lighting 276 Reflection 309 Parallax 384 225% 323 fps	MRender 373 Gravity 269 Splatting 201 221% 281 fps
Poor: 162% ↑ This bench: 199% Great: 225%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$67 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 891GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1099 1057 1010 1010 1028 1033 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	213% Outstanding	Read 1,189 Write 1062 Mixed 1,172 SusWrite 1,040 251% 1,116 MB/s	4K Read 37.4 4K Write 85.3 4K Mixed 52.2 169% 58.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,461 DQ Write 762 DQ Mixed 1,028 786% 1,084 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 213% Great: 410%
Verbatim Store n Go V3 USB 3.0 32GB-$5 2,740 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 24GB free, PID 0243 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 48 48 48 48 48 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	29.4% Poor	Read 104 Write 48.1 Mixed 32 SusWrite 47.6 69% 57.9 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 1.4 97% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 34%
Verbatim Store n Go V3 Max USB 3.0 32GB-$24 80 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 16GB free, PID 0247 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 36 36 36 36 36 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Read 39.2 Write 34.2 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 35.7 49% 36.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.7 41% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x8GB 41,916 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4080 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	MC Read 30.8 MC Write 63.7 MC Mixed 30.8 119% 41.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 29.2 SC Mixed 11.8 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 64.6 62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 275 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 110%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

CPU
Core i9-7900XIntel $413Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	72x
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	68x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	47x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	56x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	36x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	31x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 209%, 20,750 samples	38x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	14x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $67Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	10x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	93x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	41x
2x16GBUnknownBench 91%, 46,387 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $898

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16