Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 23% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3350 14,922 User benchmarks, average bench 21% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	22.3% Poor	Memory 31 1-Core 14.9 2-Core 66.6 21% 37.5 Pts	4-Core 79.7 8-Core 76.4 11% 78.1 Pts	64-Core 78.5 5% 78.5 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500 7,914 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 110E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7323 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.37% Terrible	Lighting 1.6 Reflection 1.4 Parallax 2 1% 1.67 fps	MRender 2.1 Gravity 1.6 Splatting 1.8 2% 1.83 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.37% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 120GB 5,956 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: AP613PE0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 95 95 77 83 91 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	48.6% Average	Read 290 Write 95.3 Mixed 242 SusWrite 102 40% 182 MB/s	4K Read 19.4 4K Write 50.4 4K Mixed 20.5 82% 30.1 MB/s	DQ Read 145 DQ Write 112 DQ Mixed 131 97% 129 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown S939A2SGS-ITR 1x8GB 326 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16.7% Very poor	MC Read 5.5 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 5.4 17% 6.07 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 3.9 11% 3.83 GB/s	Latency 249 16% 249 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 25%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3350IntelBench 21%, 14,922 samples	80x
Pentium N4200IntelBench 30%, 10,928 samples	19x
Celeron N3450IntelBench 27%, 6,637 samples	12x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 15,538 samples	75x
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	17x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 7,629 samples	14x

RAM
AO1L16BC4R1-BQSS 1x4GBAdataBench 20%, 3,685 samples	17x
1x2GBHYNIXBench 15%, 4,904 samples	14x
AO1L16BC4R1-BUES 1x4GBAdataBench 22%, 645 samples	11x

Value: 12% - Very poor

Total price: $70

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16