Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP300E5V-A0AAE
Memory	1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130308
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Apr 03 '22 at 18:47
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 847-$259 3,990 User benchmarks, average bench 34% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	26.4% Poor	Memory 45.5 1-Core 25.6 2-Core 43 26% 38 Pts	4-Core 45.6 8-Core 42 6% 43.8 Pts	64-Core 43.3 3% 43.3 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz) 45,735 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sanyo(144D C708) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.66% Terrible	Lighting 0.7 Reflection 1 Parallax 0.5 1% 0.73 fps	MRender 1.2 Gravity 1 Splatting 0.9 1% 1.03 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.66% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar 128GB SSD 128GB 8,135 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: R1201A SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 74 58 59 59 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	32.1% Below average	Read 299 Write 130 Mixed 153 SusWrite 65.3 36% 162 MB/s	4K Read 12.8 4K Write 20.8 4K Mixed 9.6 43% 14.4 MB/s	DQ Read 93.1 DQ Write 57.8 DQ Mixed 24.9 32% 58.6 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CK0 M471B5773CHS-CH9 4GB 53 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	24.4% Poor	MC Read 7 MC Write 8.8 MC Mixed 11.1 26% 8.97 GB/s	SC Read 5.8 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 5.3 15% 5.37 GB/s	Latency 178 22% 178 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV Builds (Compare 164 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV

CPU
Core i3-3120MIntel $100Bench 50%, 14,372 samples	58x
Celeron 847Intel $259Bench 34%, 3,990 samples	46x
Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples	24x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	91x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	49x
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	16x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $77Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	4x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	3x

RAM
M471B5273EB0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 3,287 samples	20x
M471B5273CH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,608 samples	15x
M471B5173BH0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,473 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $128

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16