Asus G10AC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus G10AC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G10AC
Memory18.1 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130510
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 27 '17 at 19:31
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Memory 95.3
1-Core 118
2-Core 236
85% 150 Pts
4-Core 459
8-Core 621
68% 540 Pts
64-Core 621
38% 621 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153
CLim: 1125 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.9.2
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 19% Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
859GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 140
Write 130
Mixed 79.7
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.13
67% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 107%
Seagate ST31000520AS 1TB-$250
408GB free
Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 94.5
Write 71.7
Mixed 21.2
45% 62.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.22
4K Mixed 0.34
84% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ASU16D3LU1KBG/8G 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBSR 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBSR 9905471-017.A00LF 20GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.2% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 9.7
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 11.1
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 56.3
71% 56.3 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G10AC Builds (Compare 369 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus G10AC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $65
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback