Acer Aspire TC-780

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-780  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-780(KBL)
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170526
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateApr 03 '22 at 05:50
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G3900-$25
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 95.5
1-Core 85.4
2-Core 170
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 172
23% 172 Pts
64-Core 168
10% 168 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720
Sapphire(174B 326B) 2GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
2.97% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 3.9
3% 3.83 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 3.3
Splatting 4.2
3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.97%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV1-8B128 128GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: G871201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 169 162 123 139 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 449
Write 176
Mixed 220
SusWrite 148
55% 248 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 78.6
4K Mixed 38.2
138% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 297
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 148
134% 207 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR24D4U7S1MB-4 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.4% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 10.6
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 9
27% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 55.4
72% 55.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire TC-780 Builds (Compare 1,600 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-780

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback