HP ProLiant ML110 G4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP ProLiant ML110 G4  (all builds)
MotherboardHP ML110 G4
Memory2.4 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20070720
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '22 at 00:04
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon 3040
PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
30% Below average
Memory 52.5
1-Core 23.7
2-Core 46
28% 40.7 Pts
4-Core 46.5
8-Core 46.9
6% 46.7 Pts
64-Core 46.4
3% 46.4 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 30%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 2400-PRO
Dell(1028 0402) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
0.76% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 0.7
1% 1.07 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 0.5
0% 0.63 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.76%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP DF072A9844 73GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPD0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 32 42 41 39 46 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36% Below average
Read 84.3
Write 48.3
Mixed 54.6
SusWrite 40.8
42% 57 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.3
231% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 36%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 512, 1024, 512 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
8.1% Terrible
MC Read 1.5
MC Write 2
MC Mixed 1.7
5% 1.73 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 4.7
13% 4.63 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.1%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProLiant ML110 G4 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP ProLiant ML110 G4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback