Gigabyte GA-F2A78M-HD2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.92% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive45.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A78M-HD2  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150427
Uptime39.4 Days
Run DateApr 02 '22 at 20:23
Run Duration796 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Memory 71.8
1-Core 61.4
2-Core 91.8
48% 75 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 180
24% 179 Pts
64-Core 181
11% 181 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.92% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 8.4
Parallax 9.9
6% 8.53 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 7.7
6% 7.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.92%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 128GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N1126K
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 108 104 89 102 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 319
Write 145
Mixed 170
SusWrite 106
41% 185 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 31
4K Mixed 21.2
59% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 62.8
74% 129 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 79%
Seagate ST3500320NS 500GB-$100
305GB free
Firmware: SN05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 93 94 93 94 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 81.5
Write 93.9
Mixed 51.2
SusWrite 93.1
59% 79.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F8G64CC8HD5 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.5% Below average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 14.6
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 9.9
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 97.3
41% 97.3 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A78M-HD2 Builds (Compare 249 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A78M-HD2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $86
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback