Onda A68V+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.46% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive77.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemOnda A68V+  (all builds)
MotherboardOnda A68V+
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 02 '22 at 19:30
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7680 Radeon R7, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
41.5% Average
Memory 46.6
1-Core 69.8
2-Core 128
46% 81.3 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 194
28% 204 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Gigabyte(1458 376D) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
6.46% Terrible
Lighting 7.8
Reflection 9.6
Parallax 7.5
6% 8.3 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 7.1
7% 8.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.46%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SP580 240GB
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.18.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 345 340 352 354 354 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 439
Write 362
Mixed 324
SusWrite 343
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 62.7
4K Mixed 18.7
102% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 30.6
70% 142 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GMT8G04UCL116P-PBC 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
36.3% Below average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 15.6
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 10.3
25% 8.6 GB/s
Latency 174
23% 174 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68V+ Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Onda A68V+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback