ADD TO PC
BUILD

Avell G1750 MUV / C65 MUV

Performance Results


Gaming 67% Battle cruiser	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 63% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	71.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	236% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Avell G1750 MUV / C65 MUV (all builds)
Motherboard	Avell Avell G1750 MUV / C65 MUV
Memory	56.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20190813
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Apr 02 '22 at 19:11
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	85.4% Excellent	Memory 87.8 1-Core 131 2-Core 254 88% 157 Pts	4-Core 446 8-Core 780 74% 613 Pts	64-Core 996 62% 996 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 85.4% Great: 87%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 506,702 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1D05 1065) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	6.34% Terrible	Lighting 6.4 Reflection 10 Parallax 8.8 5% 8.4 fps	MRender 11.5 Gravity 7.3 Splatting 11.9 8% 10.2 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.34% Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile) 82,746 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Device(1D05 1065) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	71.7% Very good	Lighting 90.1 Reflection 95.8 Parallax 84.3 73% 90.1 fps	MRender 98.6 Gravity 82.4 Splatting 74 68% 85 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDS100T3XHC-00SJG0 1TB 15,624 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 741GB free (System drive) Firmware: 102000WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 1596 1498 1489 1494 1481 1569 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	236% Outstanding	Read 1,622 Write 1,197 Mixed 1,258 SusWrite 1521 315% 1,400 MB/s	4K Read 37.4 4K Write 127 4K Mixed 54.7 194% 73.1 MB/s	DQ Read 36.3 DQ Write 795 DQ Mixed 977 590% 603 MB/s
Poor: 194% ↑ This bench: 236% Great: 334%
Toshiba HDWL110 1TB 7,333 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 189GB free Firmware: JU000A SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 86 84 84 84 86 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	65.8% Good	Read 142 Write 136 Mixed 53.5 SusWrite 86.1 76% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 0.5 208% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KF2666C16S4/32G 2x31.5GB 112 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	88.9% Excellent	MC Read 32.5 MC Write 33.8 MC Mixed 28.8 91% 31.7 GB/s	SC Read 18.6 SC Write 37 SC Mixed 27.6 79% 27.7 GB/s	Latency 69.8 57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical G1750 MUV / C65 MUV Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 52%

Yacht

Desktop

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation

Workstation 46%

Yacht

System: Avell G1750 MUV / C65 MUV

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	54x

GPU
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	22x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	17x
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	15x

SSD
SSM28512GPTCB3B-S114613 512GBBench 66%, 210 samples	13x
IM2P33F8BR1-512GB 512GBBench 168%, 103 samples	6x
XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBAdata $57Bench 242%, 74,184 samples	5x

RAM
GKE800SO102408-2666A 2x8GBUnknownBench 77%, 2,476 samples	26x
16ATF2G64HZ-2G6E1 2x16GBMicronBench 81%, 3,055 samples	3x
AM1P26KC8T1-BBSS 2x8GBAdataBench 78%, 67 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback