Sony VPCEC3M1E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSony VPCEC3M1E  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB
DisplayΧρώματα 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101006
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 02 '22 at 17:04
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 460-$130
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
46.8% Average
Memory 64.3
1-Core 68.4
2-Core 120
51% 84.3 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 170
23% 171 Pts
64-Core 172
11% 172 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6500M
Sony(104D 9071) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
3.3% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 5.2
Parallax 3.5
3% 4.27 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 3
Splatting 4.2
3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.3%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GB
209GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 210 206 210 211 211 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.1% Above average
Read 220
Write 211
Mixed 186
SusWrite 209
46% 207 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 36
4K Mixed 19.4
73% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 177
134% 180 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 105%
Generic External 128GB
21GB free, PID 3960
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 23 23 22 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
24.2% Poor
Read 27.1
Write 20.1
Mixed 22.8
SusWrite 22.7
31% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 4.9
342% 4.87 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 162%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
24.7% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 10.4
24% 8.47 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 116
35% 116 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VPCEC3M1E Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Sony VPCEC3M1E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback