Lenovo 4157U3F

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics32.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 4157U3F  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo
Memory19.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110523
Uptime6.3 Days
Run DateApr 02 '22 at 16:56
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon L5640
1366-pin LGA, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Memory 83
1-Core 56.2
2-Core 62
47% 67.1 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 281
26% 216 Pts
64-Core 392
24% 392 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Asus(1043 8465) 2GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.5% Below average
Lighting 36.6
Reflection 46
Parallax 41.6
30% 41.4 fps
MRender 53.5
Gravity 49.1
Splatting 39.2
38% 47.3 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 241
Write 226
Mixed 209
50% 225 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 41.8
4K Mixed 29.6
89% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 195
147% 196 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 85 91 79 71 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 114
Write 134
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 77.8
73% 99 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x8GB
3 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM 15h Reserved 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
41.4% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 18
42% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 10
24% 8.27 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 4157U3F Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 4157U3F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 3% - Terrible Total price: $149
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback