TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 20HH000GUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive230% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20HH000GUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20HH000GUS
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210812
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 02 '22 at 14:52
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 107
2-Core 200
75% 130 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 568
57% 462 Pts
64-Core 563
35% 563 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑
This bench: 74.7%
 Great: 77%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M1200
Legend(17AA 224D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.09
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
16% Very poor
Lighting 19.3
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 21.9
16% 19.6 fps
MRender 23.5
Gravity 22.7
Splatting 16.3
17% 20.8 fps
Poor: 12% ↑
This bench: 16%
 Great: 16%
Intel HD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 224D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9320
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
6.28% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 17.8
Parallax 7.9
6% 10.8 fps
MRender 9.6
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 11
8% 9.23 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 6.28%
 Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7L6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1062 1067 1038 896 957 980 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
230% Outstanding
Read 1,975
Write 1,224
Mixed 620
SusWrite 1,000
267% 1,205 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 99.6
4K Mixed 54.9
189% 65.9 MB/s
DQ Read 672
DQ Write 748
DQ Mixed 713
536% 711 MB/s
Poor: 134% ↑
This bench: 230%
 Great: 292%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
345GB free
Firmware: 3B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1433 1440 1440 1431 1440 1440 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 1,682
Write 1428
Mixed 751
SusWrite 1,437
297% 1,324 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 94.3
4K Mixed 49.6
170% 60.4 MB/s
DQ Read 709
DQ Write 405
DQ Mixed 477
377% 530 MB/s
Poor: 138% ↑
This bench: 232%
 Great: 283%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C14 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 31.4
MC Mixed 26.2
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 33.3
SC Mixed 25.7
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 66% ↑
This bench: 81.6%
 Great: 87%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 20HH000GUS Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 20HH000GUS

CPU
Core i7-7820HQIntelBench 63%, 15,851 samples16x
GPU
Quadro M1200NvidiaBench 15%, 4,250 samples14x
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples2x
SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 219%, 21,747 samples5x
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD  $149Bench 228%, 180,890 samples2x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples2x
RAM
CT8G4SFD824A.C16FADP Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 32GBUnknownBench 68%, 4 samples4x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 859B CT8G4SFD824A.C16FF M471A1K43CB1-CRC 859B CT8G4SFS824A.M8FE 32GBSamsungBench 77%, 3 samples2x
HyperX DDR4 2400 C14 2x16GBKingstonBench 80%, 5,417 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback