Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506II_TUF506II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics45.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive146% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506II_TUF506II  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA506II
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210312
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 02 '22 at 09:38
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 78.4
1-Core 144
2-Core 284
91% 169 Pts
4-Core 537
8-Core 938
89% 738 Pts
64-Core 1,267
78% 1,267 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile)
Asus(1043 16DF) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.32.09
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
45.6% Average
Lighting 57.3
Reflection 63.3
Parallax 53.5
47% 58 fps
MRender 62.9
Gravity 50.2
Splatting 48.8
44% 54 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GB
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P6MA001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 67 525 67 69 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
146% Outstanding
Read 1,620
Write 811
Mixed 123
SusWrite 139
146% 673 MB/s
4K Read 64.2
4K Write 49.8
4K Mixed 49.9
188% 54.6 MB/s
DQ Read 609
DQ Write 63.5
DQ Mixed 95.5
131% 256 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 146%
Great: 247%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT16G4SFS832A.C8FE Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CWE 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
MC Read 40.1
MC Write 38
MC Mixed 33.2
106% 37.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 33.1
SC Mixed 21.8
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506II_TUF506II Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506II_TUF506II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback