Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199 30,496 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	58.8% Above average	Memory 81.8 1-Core 86.8 2-Core 155 64% 108 Pts	4-Core 209 8-Core 210 28% 210 Pts	64-Core 211 13% 211 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 21F3) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	3.4% Terrible	Lighting 4.1 Reflection 2.8 Parallax 2.9 3% 3.27 fps	MRender 5 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 5.1 4% 4.2 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.4% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar 240GB SSD 240GB 2,181 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 180GB free (System drive) Firmware: V3.0.8 SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 376 381 362 365 277 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	74.6% Very good	Read 390 Write 406 Mixed 386 SusWrite 357 87% 385 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 46.1 4K Mixed 24.4 93% 31.8 MB/s	DQ Read 105 DQ Write 287 DQ Mixed 144 125% 179 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston TSB1600D3S1ELD/4GE 2x4GB 624 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	56.3% Above average	MC Read 20.5 MC Write 20.1 MC Mixed 18.1 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 17.7 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 77.3 52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	12x

SSD
mSata 1TBIndmemBench 79%, 2 samples	2x
520 Series 180GBIntel $132Bench 72%, 14,258 samples	1x
SM841 2.5" 7mm 256GBSamsungBench 82%, 2,869 samples	1x

RAM
HMT351S6EFR8C-PB 830B GDH8GB58S160 12GBHynixBench 40%, 2 samples	2x
M471B5273CH0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 5,120 samples	2x
9905428-095.D00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 52%, 636 samples	1x

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $199

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16