TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

__________________________________ _______

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 196%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 182%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics209% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive72.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System__________________________________ _______  (all builds)
Motherboard__________________________________ ___________________________________
Memory16.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210514
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 01 '22 at 19:44
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Not Available
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Memory 82.1
1-Core 171
2-Core 338
104% 197 Pts
4-Core 594
8-Core 929
94% 762 Pts
64-Core 1150
71% 1150 Pts
Poor: 85% ↑
This bench: 96.4%
 Great: 109%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
MSI(1462 3881)
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 4925 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
209% Outstanding
Lighting 310
Reflection 302
Parallax 335
252% 316 fps
MRender 339
Gravity 247
Splatting 187
203% 258 fps
Poor: 185% ↑
This bench: 209%
 Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 318 366 258 137 161 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 332
Write 372
Mixed 179
SusWrite 245
63% 282 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 89.9
4K Mixed 15.7
122% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 104
104% 170 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑
This bench: 72.1%
 Great: 117%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
38GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,692
Write 2,604
Mixed 1,940
537% 2,412 MB/s
4K Read 69.5
4K Write 190
4K Mixed 101
336% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,394
DQ Write 1,259
DQ Mixed 1,313
988% 1,322 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
94GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,584
Write 1,678
Mixed 1,722
441% 1,995 MB/s
4K Read 67.5
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 97.5
322% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1393
DQ Write 1,266
DQ Mixed 1,314
990% 1,324 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW64GX4M4E3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
86.9% Excellent
MC Read 37
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 33.9
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 25.7
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 33.5
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 64% ↑
This bench: 86.9%
 Great: 120%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical _______ Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

System: __________________________________ _______

CPU
AvailableNotBench 95%, 30 samples5x
AvailableNotBench 88%, 52 samples4x
AvailableNotBench 78%, 50 samples3x
GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples4x
RTX 2070Nvidia  $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples3x
RTX 3070Nvidia  $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples3x
SSD
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples2x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung  $155Bench 416%, 138,083 samples2x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples1x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x16GBCorsairBench 83%, 15,511 samples2x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples2x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 76%, 20,001 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $266
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback