Acer ConceptD CM100-51A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer ConceptD CM100-51A  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer ConceptD CM100-51A
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201103
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 01 '22 at 15:30
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$243
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Memory 91.8
1-Core 146
2-Core 286
96% 175 Pts
4-Core 565
8-Core 1,064
97% 814 Pts
64-Core 1,103
68% 1,103 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia T600
HP(103C 1488) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.98
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.2% Poor
Lighting 34.1
Reflection 45
Parallax 32.7
28% 37.3 fps
MRender 51
Gravity 30.6
Splatting 37.2
32% 39.6 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 30%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GB
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20110000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 658 504 488 480 460 478 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
174% Outstanding
Read 932
Write 1,189
Mixed 1,059
SusWrite 511
208% 923 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 60.8
188% 70.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,078
DQ Write 1,012
DQ Mixed 977
752% 1022 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 174%
Great: 213%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
MC Read 34.5
MC Write 35.6
MC Mixed 25.2
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 37.5
SC Mixed 26.5
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ConceptD CM100-51A Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Acer ConceptD CM100-51A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $243
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback