Maxsun MS-TZZ A10 Quad Super V2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMaxsun MS-TZZ A10 Quad Super V2.0  (all builds)
MotherboardMAXSUN MS-TZZ A10 Quad Super V2.0
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210517
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 01 '22 at 04:53
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 84%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD RX-425BB R6 Graphics
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
30.1% Below average
Memory 44.3
1-Core 42.2
2-Core 61.9
31% 49.5 Pts
4-Core 87.6
8-Core 131
14% 109 Pts
64-Core 85.1
5% 85.1 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
AMD(1002 131D) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.45.01.05
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
3.82% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 8.1
4% 6.03 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 5.6
4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.82%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ramsta S800 240GB
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RY2DV0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 320 356 343 364 341 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 348
Write 299
Mixed 332
SusWrite 333
74% 328 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 59.9
4K Mixed 9.6
81% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 14.2
52% 112 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 184 188 186 187 185 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 208
Write 180
Mixed 79.8
SusWrite 184
119% 163 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
204% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 113%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SKIHOTAR-8GB-1600 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
21.1% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 7.3
21% 7.3 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 7
18% 6.23 GB/s
Latency 183
22% 183 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-TZZ A10 Quad Super V2.0 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Maxsun MS-TZZ A10 Quad Super V2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback