Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Z87X-UD3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z87X-UD3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130803
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateApr 01 '22 at 03:03
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 110
2-Core 205
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 565
56% 457 Pts
64-Core 548
34% 548 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
EVGA(3842 2768) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.1% Poor
Lighting 29.9
Reflection 31.2
Parallax 37.2
24% 32.8 fps
MRender 39.5
Gravity 38.2
Splatting 31.7
29% 36.5 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 149 149 143 146 147 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 482
Write 230
Mixed 296
SusWrite 150
64% 290 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 46.6
4K Mixed 32.3
108% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 154
155% 254 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 116%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$39
242GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 95 95 96 95 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 102
Write 97.1
Mixed 61.7
SusWrite 95
65% 89 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
226% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 108%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
1TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 113 114 114 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 70.8
Write 84.4
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 114
54% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2
362% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 110%
HP Portable HDD 1TB
314GB free, PID 1840
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 84 84 84 84 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Read 79.3
Write 79.1
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 82.1
88% 66.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G KHX1866C10D3/8GX KHX1866C10D3/8G KHX1866C10D3/8GX 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
58.1% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 16.4
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 19.2
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z87X-UD3H-CF Builds (Compare 938 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $211
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback