Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 58% Gunboat	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 54% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	58.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	86.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170801
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 27 '17 at 06:06
Run Duration	201 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	87.1% Excellent	Memory 83.1 1-Core 122 2-Core 245 83% 150 Pts	4-Core 489 8-Core 807 79% 648 Pts	64-Core 1,013 63% 1,013 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 87.1% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399 68,699 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Sapphire(174B E285) CLim: 1120 MHz, MLim: 1395 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 16.11.5 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	58.6% Above average	Lighting 72.3 Reflection 66 Parallax 80.9 59% 73 fps	MRender 65 Gravity 59.1 Splatting 83.4 58% 69.2 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150 34,842 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 11405 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 5350 (B1) Unknown 95 95 155 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 57 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 18 (EB) Unknown 99 99 2249 (F1) Unknown 99 99 26391216742	86.7% Excellent	Read 525 Write 436 Mixed 464 106% 475 MB/s	4K Read 30 4K Write 63.4 4K Mixed 22.7 108% 38.7 MB/s	DQ Read 173 DQ Write 137 DQ Mixed 74.7 78% 128 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 86.7% Great: 110%
OCZ VERTEX2 60GB 4,861 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 40GB free Firmware: 1.37 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 120 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 64896955860531 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 7154 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 1555 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 99 99 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 12160 (EA) Unknown 0 0 7616 (F1) Unknown 0 0 7616 (F2) Unknown 0 0 20352	32.3% Below average	Read 190 Write 48.7 Mixed 80.4 23% 106 MB/s	4K Read 16.6 4K Write 47 4K Mixed 11 64% 24.8 MB/s	DQ Read 77 DQ Write 55.5 DQ Mixed 22.7 29% 51.8 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 51%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80 112,118 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 134317208 (03) Spinup time 94 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 37 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 64 60 2739488 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 283 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 34 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 75 63 420806681 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 7 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 564 (C2) HDA temperature 25 40 90194313241 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 107807974097146 (F1) Unknown 100 253 8761196562 (F2) Unknown 100 253 110372141621	72.2% Very good	Read 130 Write 122 Mixed 119 93% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 1.56 4K Mixed 0.17 78% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 114%
ST1000DM 003-1CH162 1TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 930GB free, PID 0569 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	60.3% Good	Read 145 Write 148 Mixed 157 195% 150 MB/s	4K Read 0.84 4K Write 2.26 4K Mixed 0.36 92% 1.16 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 69%
ST1000DM 003-1CH162 1TB 930GB free, PID 0569 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	64.4% Good	Read 166 Write 157 Mixed 115 183% 146 MB/s	4K Read 0.87 4K Write 1.91 4K Mixed 0.35 80% 1.04 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$32 287,720 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3066 MHz clocked @ 1533 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	106% Outstanding	MC Read 43.9 MC Write 36.7 MC Mixed 35.1 110% 38.6 GB/s	SC Read 24.8 SC Write 40.7 SC Mixed 29.8 91% 31.8 GB/s	Latency 75.1 53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,551 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	423x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $195Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	329x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	205x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	220x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	196x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	190x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	95x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	161x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	124x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $32Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	58x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $647

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)