Panasonic CF-NX2AWGCS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8.02GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8.02GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemPanasonic CF-NX2AWGCS  (all builds)
MotherboardPanasonic CFSX2-3
Memory4.2 GB free of 8.01562 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20121227
Uptime2 Days
Run DateMar 31 '22 at 09:56
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3340M
IC1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
60.1% Good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 89.2
2-Core 143
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 220
29% 218 Pts
64-Core 219
14% 219 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Device(10F7 8338) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.57% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 2
Parallax 3.1
4% 3.17 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 5.4
4% 4.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.57%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Shinedisk M667 120G 120GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0330A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 132 40 39 40 39 MB/s
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.7% Average
Read 251
Write 225
Mixed 227
SusWrite 85.5
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 40.2
4K Mixed 16.9
71% 25.3 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 35.4
66% 130 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 56GB
1333, 1333, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 49152 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.2% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.6
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 14.6
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CF-NX2AWGCS Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Panasonic CF-NX2AWGCS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback