Asus P8H61 PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H61 PLUS  (all builds)
Memory6.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130506
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateMar 31 '22 at 09:46
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 87.6
1-Core 98.9
2-Core 188
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 298
44% 321 Pts
64-Core 243
15% 243 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
MSI(1462 2825) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.8% Poor
Lighting 34.8
Reflection 35.1
Parallax 46.4
28% 38.8 fps
MRender 49.8
Gravity 37.1
Splatting 35.4
33% 40.8 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
866GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 194 200 196 21 22 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40% Below average
Read 211
Write 193
Mixed 189
SusWrite 125
40% 180 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 42.4
4K Mixed 16.3
71% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 24
DQ Write 88.4
DQ Mixed 21.7
27% 44.7 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 40%
Great: 100%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
462GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 170 173 173 171 171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 151
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 170
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 104%
Seagate ST3250820AS 250GB-$50
226GB free
Firmware: 3.AAD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 75 77 77 78 78 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 76.3
Write 42.8
Mixed 43.2
SusWrite 76.7
44% 59.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0B29 KAi-D3ZU1600M 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.9% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 9.7
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 7.9
20% 7.17 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61 PLUS Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H61 PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $563
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback