Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics22.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161207
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 27 '17 at 01:57
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Memory 69
1-Core 66.8
2-Core 128
53% 87.8 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 202
27% 201 Pts
64-Core 199
12% 199 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1212 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.9.2
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
22.3% Poor
Lighting 26.1
Reflection 30.8
Parallax 30.3
21% 29.1 fps
MRender 29.6
Gravity 23.7
Splatting 33.6
24% 29 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS681 120GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP108PE0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 308
Write 191
Mixed 439
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 52.3
4K Mixed 4.73
63% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 6.65
45% 102 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$50
320GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 131
Mixed 138
115% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.89
4K Mixed 0.17
77% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5403-160.A 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.4% Below average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 13.6
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 10.8
24% 8.33 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A68HM-DS2 Builds (Compare 291 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback