Toshiba Satellite C605

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba Satellite C605  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110328
Uptime15.6 Days
Run DateMar 31 '22 at 03:59
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium T4500
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
38.2% Below average
Memory 65.2
1-Core 36
2-Core 66.4
37% 55.9 Pts
4-Core 68.7
8-Core 66.2
9% 67.4 Pts
64-Core 68.2
4% 68.2 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Familia Mobile Intel 45 Express Chipset
Toshiba(1179 FDE0) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1749
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.17% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.4 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.23 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.17%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
428GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 103 78 70 48 45 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
50% Above average
Read 108
Write 46
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 66.4
51% 69 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 50%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 3.9
12% 4.23 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 4.3
11% 3.87 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite C605 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Toshiba Satellite C605

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback