HP 700-567nz

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics93.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive80.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP 700-567nz  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B36
Memory9.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1400 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150520
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateMar 30 '22 at 23:04
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 79.8
1-Core 113
2-Core 180
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 564
60% 481 Pts
64-Core 608
38% 608 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273
Nvidia(10DE 12FB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3505 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 107
Parallax 108
98% 112 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 99.7
Splatting 89.4
86% 107 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 281 295 291 294 292 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 504
Write 294
Mixed 274
SusWrite 289
76% 341 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 79.1
4K Mixed 16.5
100% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 297
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 197
176% 266 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 128%
WDC WD20EZBX-00AYRA0 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 186 190 190 190 191 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 200
Write 196
Mixed 107
SusWrite 188
39% 173 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 9.6
4K Mixed 1.3
33% 9.47 MB/s
DQ Read 1.7
DQ Write 14.1
DQ Mixed 1.3
3% 5.7 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata Micron 8KTF51264AZ-1G6E1 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.8% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 10.8
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 12.9
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 80.9
49% 80.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700-567nz Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: HP 700-567nz

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback