Lenovo 20FB002LUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive81.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 20FB002LUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20FB002LUS
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160623
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 30 '22 at 19:21
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6600U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 75.8
1-Core 95.5
2-Core 174
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 247
8-Core 248
33% 248 Pts
64-Core 256
16% 256 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 2238) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4312
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
5.01% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 6.2
4% 5.53 fps
MRender 6.3
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 9.2
6% 7.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.01%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsun MZNLN512HMJP-000 512GB
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 105 79 76 77 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 349
Write 275
Mixed 248
SusWrite 110
55% 245 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 75
4K Mixed 43.5
146% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 342
257% 343 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 120%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4EBE304EE-EGCF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Chip LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
63% Good
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 20.8
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 19
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 88.6
45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20FB002LUS Builds (Compare 55 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20FB002LUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback