Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.58% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive64.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970A-DS3  (all builds)
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20120814
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 30 '22 at 18:46
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU5%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
60.1% Good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 59.6
2-Core 108
53% 83.6 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 333
33% 269 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Nvidia(10DE 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 902 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
7.58% Terrible
Lighting 8.8
Reflection 12.2
Parallax 8.4
7% 9.8 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 9.9
Splatting 8.8
8% 10.5 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 7.58%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier SP550 240GB-$74
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0121AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 52 51 51 50 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 410
Write 376
Mixed 356
SusWrite 83.3
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 57.6
4K Mixed 32.7
103% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 221
169% 229 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 92%
Bc711 NVMe SK hynix 256GB
100GB free
Firmware: 41002131 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 602 431 452 443 436 478 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 1,111
Write 818
Mixed 946
SusWrite 474
187% 837 MB/s
4K Read 54.2
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 68.2
223% 74.4 MB/s
DQ Read 474
DQ Write 416
DQ Mixed 442
332% 444 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 163%
Great: 273%
USB FLASH DRIVE 1GB
1GB free, PID b113
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
2.64% Terrible
Read 9
Write 2
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 2.1
4% 3.95 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.64%
Great: 9%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 1TB
1TB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 3.4 12 14 14 9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
5.9% Terrible
Read 17
Write 9.5
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 9.8
12% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.9%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 15.4
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 13
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 45%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970A-DS3 Builds (Compare 351 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3 - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $366
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback