Supermicro X9DRW

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Supermicro X9DRW (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X9DRW
Memory	59.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131128
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 30 '22 at 16:55
Run Duration	215 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 1,386 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	67.2% Good	Memory 74.8 1-Core 80.1 2-Core 160 61% 105 Pts	4-Core 320 8-Core 637 56% 479 Pts	64-Core 1,024 63% 1,024 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$84 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% EVGA(3842 6150) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	29.6% Poor	Lighting 39.1 Reflection 35.8 Parallax 32.9 32% 35.9 fps	MRender 38.4 Gravity 33.8 Splatting 23.4 25% 31.9 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 250GB SSD 2,686 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 169GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900613 SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 221 99 99 101 98 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.9% Below average	Read 214 Write 91 Mixed 130 SusWrite 148 32% 146 MB/s	4K Read 20.9 4K Write 24.6 4K Mixed 15.2 64% 20.2 MB/s	DQ Read 15.8 DQ Write 22.8 DQ Mixed 19.1 14% 19.2 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 105%
PNY CS1030 500GB SSD 980 User benchmarks, average bench 170% 466GB free Firmware: CS103700 SusWrite @10s intervals: 805 805 804 804 807 808 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	158% Outstanding	Read 951 Write 814 Mixed 826 SusWrite 806 191% 849 MB/s	4K Read 41.5 4K Write 85.4 4K Mixed 53.5 177% 60.1 MB/s	DQ Read 370 DQ Write 340 DQ Mixed 433 304% 381 MB/s
Poor: 101% ↑ This bench: 158% Great: 243%
SanDisk Cruzer Spark 64GB 1,071 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 53GB free, PID 55a1 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 11 9.7 9.6 9.8 10 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	11.5% Very poor	Read 32.8 Write 9.8 Mixed 17.7 SusWrite 9.7 20% 17.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 3.1 160% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 18%
USB Flash Disk 32GB 218 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 17GB free, PID 2000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 11 11 11 12 13 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	6.99% Terrible	Read 24.1 Write 14.7 Mixed 14.7 SusWrite 11.8 21% 16.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 1.6 69% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.99% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Samsung M392B5170EM1-CH9 Samsung M392B5170EM1-CH9 Samsung M392B5170EM1-CH9 Samsung M392B5170EM1-CH9 Samsung M392B5170EM1-CH9 Samsung M392B5170EM1-CH9 Samsung M392B5... 64GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	65.8% Good	MC Read 36.6 MC Write 19.2 MC Mixed 22.9 75% 26.2 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 5.3 20% 7.17 GB/s	Latency 90.8 44% 90.8 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X9DRW Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 44%

Speed boat

System: Supermicro X9DRW

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples	6x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2660 01stBench 62%, 884 samples	2x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v21stBench 66%, 1,377 samples	1x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	2x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	2x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	1x

SSD
Solid State Disk 1TBSpccBench 79%, 17,192 samples	3x
CS900 240GBPNY $25Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	2x
CS1030 500GB SSDPNYBench 170%, 980 samples	2x

RAM
Samsung M392B5170EM1-CH9 Samsung M392B5170EM1-CH9 Samsung M392B5170EM1-CH9 Samsung M392B5170EM1-CH9 Samsung M392B5170EM1-CH9 Samsung M392B5170EM1-CH9 Samsung M392B5... 64GBUnknownBench 84%, 8 samples	6x
9965516-051.A00LF 8x8GBKingstonBench 89%, 36 samples	1x
9965516-051.A00LF 4x8GBKingstonBench 73%, 20 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $130

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16