MSI H61M-P23(G3)(MS-7680)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMSI MS-7680
MotherboardMSI H61M-P23(G3)(MS-7680)  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20131016
Uptime12.7 Days
Run DateMar 30 '22 at 16:44
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G550-$49
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Memory 81.8
1-Core 51
2-Core 134
54% 89 Pts
4-Core 124
8-Core 133
17% 128 Pts
64-Core 132
8% 132 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Gigabyte(1458 36ED) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.98
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.62% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 4.5
4% 4.47 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 4.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.62%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5000AVCS-6 500GB
282GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 36 8.2 11 49 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Read 65.7
Write 70.7
Mixed 53.1
SusWrite 31
41% 55.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
76% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1333KLN-4G Kingston 99U5474-028.A00LF 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.9% Average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 13.7
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 12.8
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-P23(G3)(MS-7680) Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI H61M-P23(G3)(MS-7680)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $132
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback