MSI B450 Tomahawk

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics75.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive237% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 Tomahawk  (all builds)
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210422
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMar 30 '22 at 13:44
Run Duration257 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Memory 75.6
1-Core 123
2-Core 245
81% 148 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 759
76% 616 Pts
64-Core 936
58% 936 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Lighting 94.5
Reflection 90.9
Parallax 92.5
77% 92.6 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 81
Splatting 73.6
71% 89.5 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1419 401 400 402 406 404 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 2419
Write 2,176
Mixed 1,550
SusWrite 572
374% 1,679 MB/s
4K Read 56.5
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 71.9
233% 77.3 MB/s
DQ Read 918
DQ Write 562
DQ Mixed 784
572% 755 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 237%
Great: 302%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
397GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 187 189 190 191 186 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 145
Write 101
Mixed 81.5
SusWrite 188
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
906GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 173 173 164 175 175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 166
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 172
111% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 105%
Great: 113%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB
21GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 26 26 27 26 25 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
27.2% Poor
Read 113
Write 32.2
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 26.4
57% 52.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 2.5
147% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 58%
A-DATA USB Flash Drive 4GB
0GB free, PID c96a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 4.4 5.7 6 6 6 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
6.18% Terrible
Read 20.5
Write 1
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 5.5
8% 8.07 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
32% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.18%
Great: 7%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB
0GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 0.5
0% 0.5 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL16-18-18 D4-3200 TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 32GB
2933, 2933, 2933, 2933 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
86.7% Excellent
MC Read 34.3
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 30.2
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 23.3
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 25.2
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 7,357 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B450 Tomahawk - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $687
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback