Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	34.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 723 52 User benchmarks, average bench 26% CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	38.1% Below average	Memory 74 1-Core 16.4 2-Core 12.8 30% 34.4 Pts	4-Core 17.3 8-Core 18.2 2% 17.8 Pts	64-Core 18.3 1% 18.3 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
P3-256 256GB 2,367 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 221GB free (System drive) Firmware: FW201105 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 178 214 216 206 210 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.5% Below average	Read 163 Write 219 Mixed 191 SusWrite 190 43% 191 MB/s	4K Read 15.1 4K Write 30.6 4K Mixed 8.1 50% 17.9 MB/s	DQ Read 47 DQ Write 42.2 DQ Mixed 15.4 20% 34.9 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 98%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 1GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 1.7 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	7.08% Terrible	Read 15.8 Write 4 Mixed 10.3 SusWrite 1.6 9% 7.92 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1.5 104% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.08% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair VS2GSDS800D2 2x2GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 800 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	13.7% Very poor	MC Read 4.4 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 3.6 11% 3.83 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 3.5 11% 3.9 GB/s	Latency 92.5 43% 92.5 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 14%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 30%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
U2300IntelBench 30%, 281 samples	3x
Celeron 743IntelBench 27%, 230 samples	2x
Core2 Solo U3500IntelBench 28%, 486 samples	2x

GPU
Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset FamilyIntelBench 0%, 23,924 samples	7x
Intel 45 Express Chipset FamilyMobileBench 1%, 2,404 samples	1x

SSD
WDBNCE5000PNC 500GBWDCBench 94%, 17,781 samples	1x
480GB 480GBSSDBench 65%, 2,159 samples	1x

RAM
TS256MSQ64V6U 2x2GBTranscendBench 15%, 24 samples	1x
NT2GT64U8HD0BN-AD 2x2GBNanyaBench 17%, 209 samples	1x
EBE21UE8AFSA-8G-F 1x2GBUnknownBench 11%, 42 samples	1x