............... .........................

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive157% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
System............... .........................  (all builds)
Motherboard............... Ironman_SK
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171024
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateMar 30 '22 at 05:46
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
55% Above average
Memory 71.3
1-Core 82.6
2-Core 145
59% 99.5 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 220
30% 223 Pts
64-Core 219
14% 219 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 55%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Acer(1025 1094) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6286
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
5.45% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 12.4
Parallax 6.9
5% 8.47 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 9.2
6% 7.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.45%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
267GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 329 282 294 399 370 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 718
Write 705
Mixed 713
SusWrite 345
139% 620 MB/s
4K Read 53.8
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 72.5
237% 81.4 MB/s
DQ Read 877
DQ Write 618
DQ Mixed 717
544% 737 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 157%
Great: 295%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 500GB
438GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 27 26 27 30 32 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 4,180
Write 16.8
Mixed 64
SusWrite 26.5
223% 1,072 MB/s
4K Read 574
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 2.7
874% 193 MB/s
Poor: 69% Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905700-025.A00G Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B1 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
67.7% Good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 20.7
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 21.6
60% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 98.4
41% 98.4 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ......................... Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: ............... .........................

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $68
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback