Advantech POC-W212

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 73% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAdvantech POC-W212  (all builds)
MotherboardINTEL SHARKBAY
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150302
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 30 '22 at 04:04
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 73%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4650U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
55.4% Above average
Memory 72.8
1-Core 92.3
2-Core 154
63% 106 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 219
30% 220 Pts
64-Core 219
14% 219 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5000 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Intel(8086 0A26) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
3.79% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 6
4% 4.43 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 3.8
3% 3.77 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.79%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
424GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 218 212 217 207 215 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Read 414
Write 403
Mixed 293
SusWrite 218
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 64.9
4K Mixed 39.4
133% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 240
206% 306 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend AQD-SD3L4GN16-S G 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
29.7% Poor
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 8.3
28% 9.97 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 10
25% 8.63 GB/s
Latency 95.1
42% 95.1 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical POC-W212 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Advantech POC-W212

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback