Toshiba SATELLITE L755

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE L755  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel Base Board Product Name
Memory3.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 30 '22 at 00:15
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
43.7% Average
Memory 67
1-Core 40.3
2-Core 84.3
41% 63.9 Pts
4-Core 118
8-Core 138
17% 128 Pts
64-Core 151
9% 151 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 525M
Toshiba(1179 FC50) 1GB
CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
2.46% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 3
Parallax 0.7
2% 2.23 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 3
Splatting 2.2
2% 3.17 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.46%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900615
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 210 90 70 74 69 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.8% Average
Read 247
Write 125
Mixed 218
SusWrite 123
40% 178 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 20.4
4K Mixed 18.1
58% 18 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 229
DQ Mixed 178
149% 215 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
42.3% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 15.3
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 11.3
19% 6.73 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE L755 Builds (Compare 509 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE L755

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $188
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback