Clevo Modified by dsanke

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics78.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive185% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemClevo Modified by dsanke  (all builds)
MotherboardClevo P7xxDM2/DM3(-G)
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 29 '22 at 17:46
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel 0000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 109
2-Core 195
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 674
64% 529 Pts
64-Core 850
53% 850 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 7509) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Lighting 94.8
Reflection 123
Parallax 96.3
77% 105 fps
MRender 93.9
Gravity 96.7
Splatting 104
81% 98.2 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pcie SSD 512GB
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFMB0.5 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1320 292 270 271 270 255 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
185% Outstanding
Read 1258
Write 1,374
Mixed 1,265
SusWrite 446
244% 1,086 MB/s
4K Read 45.9
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 65.4
220% 79.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,030
DQ Write 720
DQ Mixed 879
655% 876 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 185%
Great: 267%
Toshiba MQ04ABD200 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: JT000U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 260 266 266 265 254 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 29% Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFD826A.C16FBR 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
87.1% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 34.4
MC Mixed 26.8
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 37.3
SC Mixed 25.6
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Modified by dsanke Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

System: Clevo Modified by dsanke

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $221
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback