Lenovo 82NJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.55% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive227% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 82NJ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display2240 x 1400 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 29 '22 at 11:42
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600HS Creator Edition
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 65
1-Core 125
2-Core 174
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 294
41% 302 Pts
64-Core 533
33% 533 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Legend(17AA 3AAB) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.14.01
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
8.55% Terrible
Lighting 9.1
Reflection 24.7
Parallax 14.8
7% 16.2 fps
MRender 13.6
Gravity 11.1
Splatting 14.3
11% 13 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 8.55%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000L2 512GB
423GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3L1QEXF7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1766 818 708 768 782 758 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
227% Outstanding
Read 2,228
Write 2,183
Mixed 1,291
SusWrite 933
371% 1,659 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 76.9
4K Mixed 55.8
165% 55.9 MB/s
DQ Read 796
DQ Write 499
DQ Mixed 744
529% 680 MB/s
Poor: 156%
This bench: 227%
Great: 296%
WD Game Drive 2TB
284GB free, PID 2630
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 24 32 33 31 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 20.9
Write 28.8
Mixed 20.9
SusWrite 30.3
36% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.2
82% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4UBE3D4AA-MGCR 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4266 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
82.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 28.6
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 35.2
SC Mixed 25.3
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82NJ Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 82NJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback