HP CQ3665AN-b

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.73% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP CQ3665AN-b  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AC2
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20110329
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMar 29 '22 at 10:24
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
61.5% Good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 74.9
2-Core 138
63% 101 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 191
26% 191 Pts
64-Core 180
11% 180 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Asus(1043 8439) 1GB
CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 472.98
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
8.73% Terrible
Lighting 10
Reflection 14.2
Parallax 11.8
8% 12 fps
MRender 13.8
Gravity 12.1
Splatting 10.8
10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.73%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$128
753GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 90 92 106 108 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 104
Write 119
Mixed 55.4
SusWrite 98.5
69% 94.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
186% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4D1 16KTF51264AZ-1G4M1 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
50.8% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 15.2
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CQ3665AN-b Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP CQ3665AN-b

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $161
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback