AZOM EXIGO V2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAZOM EXIGO V2  (all builds)
MotherboardAZOM EXIGO V2 powered by premamod.com
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 29 '22 at 06:50
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 88.9
1-Core 115
2-Core 227
81% 144 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 344
42% 323 Pts
64-Core 375
23% 375 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 71%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 7506) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.8% Average
Lighting 56.7
Reflection 95.6
Parallax 57.7
46% 70 fps
MRender 60.8
Gravity 57
Splatting 58
48% 58.6 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8250G 250GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,344
Write 935
Mixed 908
235% 1,062 MB/s
4K Read 53.4
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 67.6
226% 77.4 MB/s
DQ Read 806
DQ Write 501
DQ Mixed 306
321% 538 MB/s
Poor: 103% Great: 236%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
42GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 78 77 76 77 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 73
Write 80
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 77.1
45% 62.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 75%
WD WD2500LPVX-00V0TT0 250GB
233GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0 0.2 0.1 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
22.3% Poor
Read 77.2
Write 71.5
Mixed 52
SusWrite 0.1
37% 50.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C14 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
78.2% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 26.1
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 29
SC Mixed 22.3
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EXIGO V2 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

System: AZOM EXIGO V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $267
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback