Asus SABERTOOTH P67

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics46.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH P67  (all builds)
Memory29.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 26 '17 at 17:53
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 97.9
1-Core 117
2-Core 230
85% 148 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 596
62% 501 Pts
64-Core 595
37% 595 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
EVGA(3842 0783) 3GB
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 385.28
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.1% Average
Lighting 56.2
Reflection 51.6
Parallax 64.9
46% 57.6 fps
MRender 65.5
Gravity 61.5
Splatting 48.4
47% 58.5 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 104
Write 108
Mixed 101
78% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.79
4K Write 1.75
4K Mixed 0.12
79% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 83%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: JA0OA5M0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 103
Write 105
Mixed 95.5
76% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.43
4K Mixed 0.16
65% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 57%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
361GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 293
Write 222
Mixed 214
182% 243 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.56
4K Mixed 0.75
226% 2.24 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 148%
Great: 158%
Lexar JumpDrive P10 USB 3.0 64GB-$18
28GB free, PID a836
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 200
Write 108
Mixed 133
173% 147 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 1.09
4K Mixed 0.91
112% 4.65 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
74.9% Very good
MC Read 26
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 24
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 23.2
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 46.5
86% 46.5 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH P67 Builds (Compare 1,280 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH P67

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $595
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback