Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 19% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	8.19% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3050 14,457 User benchmarks, average bench 19% FCBGA15, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Memory 26.6 1-Core 16.4 2-Core 39 17% 27.3 Pts	4-Core 37.3 8-Core 36.5 5% 36.9 Pts	64-Core 38.5 2% 38.5 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 27%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 8534) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	1.58% Terrible	Lighting 1.6 Reflection 1.5 Parallax 2.5 1% 1.87 fps	MRender 2.8 Gravity 1.7 Splatting 3.1 2% 2.53 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.58% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk P4 64GB 194 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: SSD 8.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 38 45 44 62 48 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	8.19% Terrible	Read 78.2 Write 17.3 Mixed 19.5 SusWrite 43.8 9% 39.7 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 2 8% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.19% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMT3170MN68F9F1600 Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 8GB 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	17.2% Very poor	MC Read 5 MC Write 8.5 MC Mixed 5.6 18% 6.37 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 3.5 11% 3.7 GB/s	Latency 276 14% 276 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 21%

Surfboard

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3050IntelBench 19%, 14,457 samples	3x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	2x
Radeon HD 5400ATIBench 1%, 10,400 samples	1x

SSD
P4 64GBSandiskBench 13%, 194 samples	1x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	1x
RMT3170MN68F9F1600 Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 8GBUnknownBench 17%, 1 sample	1x
99U5595-002.A00LF 1x2GBKingstonBench 25%, 220 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16