Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X540MAR_X540MAR (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X540MAR
Memory	0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210108
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 28 '22 at 18:47
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4020 5,047 User benchmarks, average bench 21% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	29.8% Poor	Memory 40.2 1-Core 56.7 2-Core 117 40% 71.3 Pts	4-Core 114 8-Core 108 15% 111 Pts	64-Core 103 6% 103 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 29%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 1232) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.69% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 2.6 Parallax 1.2 2% 1.93 fps	MRender 2.8 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 1.9 2% 2.27 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.69% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 480GB 480GB 2,159 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 371GB free (System drive) Firmware: FW201219 SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 241 209 220 241 283 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	55.7% Above average	Read 346 Write 248 Mixed 272 SusWrite 243 62% 277 MB/s	4K Read 26.9 4K Write 44.4 4K Mixed 8.7 75% 26.7 MB/s	DQ Read 162 DQ Write 94 DQ Mixed 19.3 44% 91.6 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown K4F8E304HB-MGCj 4x1GB 404 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.9% Very poor	MC Read 2.8 MC Write 7.4 MC Mixed 5.6 15% 5.27 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 4.2 SC Mixed 3.4 9% 3.27 GB/s	Latency 201 20% 201 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 26%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4020IntelBench 21%, 5,047 samples	19x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	19x

RAM
K4F8E304HB-MGCj 4x1GBUnknownBench 20%, 404 samples	19x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16