Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	21.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3060 20,242 User benchmarks, average bench 18% CHV, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	25.4% Poor	Memory 43.8 1-Core 21.7 2-Core 42.8 24% 36.1 Pts	4-Core 43.4 8-Core 42.4 6% 42.9 Pts	64-Core 41.2 2% 41.2 Pts
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 28%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 81E1) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4509 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.33% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 0.8 Parallax 2.4 1% 1.57 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 1.7 Splatting 2 2% 1.87 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.33% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
BHT WR202HH064G E70215F5 63GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: 150100 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 77 87 83 83 85 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	21.8% Poor	Read 150 Write 88.1 Mixed 99.2 SusWrite 83 24% 105 MB/s	4K Read 11.3 4K Write 11.7 4K Mixed 7.8 33% 10.3 MB/s	DQ Read 16.2 DQ Write 13.8 DQ Mixed 10.5 9% 13.5 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 24%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451S6DFR8A-PB 1x4GB 6,087 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.9% Very poor	MC Read 4.2 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 4.3 15% 5.2 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 2.8 10% 3.33 GB/s	Latency 185 22% 185 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	2,511x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	1,747x
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	1,185x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	402x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	379x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	345x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16