HP ProOne 400 G2 20-in Non-Touch AiO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics5.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProOne 400 G2 20-in Non-Touch AiO  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8063
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170420
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 28 '22 at 07:51
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 66%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100T-$108
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
29.3% Poor
Memory 31.9
1-Core 99.6
2-Core 192
55% 108 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 137
20% 148 Pts
64-Core 161
10% 161 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 8063) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
5.03% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 6.2
4% 5.17 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 5.1
Splatting 9.3
6% 7.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.03%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk X400 2.5 7MM 128GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4152012
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 462
Write 306
Mixed 304
79% 357 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 52.5
4K Mixed 35.4
117% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 232
188% 267 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 90%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB
7GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 7.7 8.8 7.9 8.8 8 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
4.39% Terrible
Read 12
Write 0.2
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 7.5
6% 5.35 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.39%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244BB0-CRC Kingston 9905711-007.A00G 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
43.9% Average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 18.4
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 17.3
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 244
16% 244 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProOne 400 G2 20-in Non-Touch AiO Builds (Compare 169 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProOne 400 G2 20-in Non-Touch AiO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $113
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback