Acer Aspire TC-710

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire TC-710  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-710
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151231
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 27 '22 at 10:56
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$67
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 82
1-Core 93.1
2-Core 204
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 372
52% 383 Pts
64-Core 376
23% 376 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720
Sapphire(174B 326B) 2GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.98
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
3.01% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 3.8
3% 3.83 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 3.3
Splatting 4.2
3% 3.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.01%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
963GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 67 58 95 98 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
32.7% Below average
Read 40.3
Write 120
Mixed 92.4
SusWrite 73.4
61% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LU1KNG/8G Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
62.2% Good
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 19.5
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 20.3
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire TC-710 Builds (Compare 431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-710

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $67
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback