Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	54.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	305% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	57.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190528
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 27 '22 at 00:31
Run Duration	111 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 841 User benchmarks, average bench 72% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	73.6% Very good	Memory 77.9 1-Core 98.6 2-Core 195 70% 124 Pts	4-Core 372 8-Core 733 65% 553 Pts	64-Core 1,694 105% 1,694 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 390X-$340 26,573 User benchmarks, average bench 54% Asus(1043 04E9) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	54.4% Above average	Lighting 71 Reflection 75.5 Parallax 93.7 58% 80.1 fps	MRender 66.4 Gravity 67.4 Splatting 46.1 48% 60 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 57%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$106 276,089 User benchmarks, average bench 394% 756GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2218 2079 1938 1933 1931 1942 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	305% Outstanding	Read 2,263 Write 2,094 Mixed 2,054 SusWrite 2,007 474% 2,104 MB/s	4K Read 57.7 4K Write 95.9 4K Mixed 71.4 230% 75 MB/s	DQ Read 535 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 427 323% 438 MB/s
Poor: 274% ↑ This bench: 305% Great: 488%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3333 C16 4x16GB 328 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2197 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	67.3% Good	MC Read 30.4 MC Write 19.4 MC Mixed 24.7 71% 24.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 18.6 SC Mixed 17.4 47% 16.3 GB/s	Latency 84.5 47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 158%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-E WS/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 262 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 98%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

CPU
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	39x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	28x
Core i7-6900KIntel $120Bench 86%, 6,755 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	31x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	27x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	21x

SSD
SSDSC2BB150G7 150GBIntelBench 52%, 328 samples	20x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	11x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	10x

RAM
M393A1K43DB2-CWE 8x8GBSamsungBench 146%, 50 samples	6x
SP008GXLZU320BSA 4x8GBSilicon-PowerBench 99%, 50 samples	6x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 4x16GBSamsungBench 92%, 1,230 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $770

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16