PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 24.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | ECS H87H3-M3 (all builds) |
Memory | 10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150410 |
Uptime | 2.9 Days |
Run Date | Mar 26 '22 at 23:09 |
Run Duration | 283 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 26% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
62.7%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
24.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hitachi HDS721010CLA630 1TB
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP4OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 64 61 72 77 MB/s
|
51.4%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 M378B1G73BH0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
52.8%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples | 4x |
Xeon E3-1220 v3Intel $104Bench 69%, 5,273 samples | 3x |
Core i5-4440Intel $79Bench 61%, 81,111 samples | 2x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 4x |
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 4x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $200 |