Packard imedia S3840

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemPackard imedia S3840  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard imedia S3840
Memory4.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 26 '22 at 10:53
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G620-$30
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
44.4% Average
Memory 69.5
1-Core 63.3
2-Core 111
50% 81.2 Pts
4-Core 114
8-Core 120
16% 117 Pts
64-Core 124
8% 124 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 510
Sapphire(174B 1222) 1GB
CLim: 523 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.48% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 0.3
2% 1.7 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.67 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.48%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
439GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 225 228 234 224 219 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65.9% Good
Read 235
Write 218
Mixed 214
SusWrite 225
50% 223 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 46.3
4K Mixed 33.5
109% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 195
146% 194 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 129%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
11GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.4 4.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
7.25% Terrible
Read 30
Write 2.7
Mixed 8
SusWrite 4.3
11% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 1.9
90% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.25%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unifosa HU524303EP0200 HU564403EP0200 6GB
1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
37.8% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 12.6
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 10.9
32% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical imedia S3840 Builds (Compare 118 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Packard imedia S3840

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $103
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback