Acer Aspire E5-575

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.66% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive83.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire E5-575  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Ironman_SK
Memory7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180906
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 25 '22 at 21:19
Run Duration262 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 30%
CPU Throttled 96%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 90.1
1-Core 88
2-Core 150
67% 109 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 220
30% 226 Pts
64-Core 213
13% 213 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Acer(1025 1094) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1192
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
5.66% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 7.3
5% 6.07 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 9.7
6% 7.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.66%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP300 NVMe PCIe M.2 120GB-$75
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FM11.7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 192 129 129 134 139 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Read 508
Write 391
Mixed 445
SusWrite 166
84% 377 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 58.4
4K Mixed 38.7
124% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 353
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 333
246% 326 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 128%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
96GB free
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 69 59 60 57 59 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 469
Write 350
Mixed 318
SusWrite 87.4
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 69
4K Mixed 36.5
127% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 304
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 104
128% 225 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 82%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 2BC10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 118 113 116 115 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 113
Write 80.6
Mixed 65.1
SusWrite 111
68% 92.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 70%
SMI USB DISK 3.1 64GB
4GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 12 0.1 0.4 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 42.4
Write 39
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 11.8
42% 32.6 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 3.1
199% 4.03 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AO1P21FC4R1-B2MS 029E CMSX8GX4M1A2400C16 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65% Good
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 19.5
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 17.8
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-575 Builds (Compare 948 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-575

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback