Asus X301A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus X301A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X301A
Memory0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 25 '22 at 17:24
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2350M
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Memory 82.6
1-Core 55
2-Core 91.8
50% 76.5 Pts
4-Core 147
8-Core 147
20% 147 Pts
64-Core 149
9% 149 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Asus(1043 14F7) 774MB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
1.23% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 0.7
1% 1.13 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 1.4
1% 1.73 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.23%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot P210 256GB
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H201230
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 193 43 41 17 11 MB/s
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.8% Above average
Read 268
Write 152
Mixed 164
SusWrite 90.8
37% 169 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 49.5
4K Mixed 29.4
106% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 91.4
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 124
90% 115 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CK0 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
26% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 8
24% 8.43 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.4 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 26%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X301A Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X301A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback